----- Mensaje reenviado -----
De: JV <fibonacci@racsa.co.cr>
Para: JV <fibonacci@racsa.co.cr>
Enviado: Miércoles 27 de junio de 2012 10:29
Asunto: FW: Something Costa Ricans should also know! - New World Order Blueprint Leaked
De: JV <fibonacci@racsa.co.cr>
Para: JV <fibonacci@racsa.co.cr>
Enviado: Miércoles 27 de junio de 2012 10:29
Asunto: FW: Something Costa Ricans should also know! - New World Order Blueprint Leaked
Con todo respeto propongo lectura del siguiente informe. Debo admitir que
aún no he tenido oportunidad de leerlo en su totalidad (voy como por la
mitad).
No obstsante conozco a la persona que lo remite y puedo dar fe de su
conocimiento sobre el tema y de su buen juicio.
NOTA ADICIONAL: El hecho de que lo comparta con ustedes no implica que
concuerde con la información y puntos de vista expresados en el informe.
Ellos son el criterio independiente de quien o quienes lo escriben. Soy un
simple mensajero en este caso. Precisamente una de las pocas libertades que
aún nos quedan es poder escuchar, leer y analizar diversos puntos de vista
para poder obtener nuestras propias conclusiones y convicciones, sin
etiquetas que nos prejuicien y limiten nuestra capacidad de llegar a
conclusiones bien fundamentadas.
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Lunes, 25 de Junio de 2012 06:37 p.m.
To:
Subject: Something Costa Ricans should also know! - New World Order
Blueprint Leaked
New World Order Blueprint Leaked
On June 12, a leaked copy of the investment chapter for the Trans-Pacific
Partnership (TPP) was made public. This copy was analyzed by Public
Citizen's Global Trade Watch and has been verified as authentic. This
agreement has been negotiated IN SECRET for 2-1/2 years and no information
has ever been released until this leak. So why have the details of this
negotiation been so secret? This agreement has been framed as a "free
trade" agreement and yet out of 26 chapters only two have anything to do
with trade. The other 24 chapters grant new corporate privileges and
rights, while limiting governments and protective regulations.
If implemented, this agreement will hard code corporate dominance over
sovereign governments into international law that will supercede any
federal, state, or local laws of any member country. This document alone
should set alarm bells ringing, but if one steps back and looks at the
larger picture, the future ramifications look even more ominous. After
completing this reading, see what your conclusions are.
This video is a must see for anyone who wishes to more fully understand
the implications of this secretly negotiated agreement. This article will
also show how if this agreement is considered in the context of other
recently passed legislation and developments, and the "dots are
connected", the results would be total corporate global governance with an
accompanying police state. In this new system the role of elected
governments would be to serve as subservient agents for the transnational
corporations, while the armies, police, and courts would serve the
interests of these transnational corporations. The status of the member
states would be locked-in, similar to countries once they are inside the
Eurozone.
The TPP is being negotiated by some of the same characters that brought
us NAFTA, CAFTA and other so called free trade agreements. Some of the
provisions in this document include the establishment of a parallel system
of justice to be administered by 3 attorneys with no conflict of interest
limitations. This 3 attorney tribunal could order sovereign governments to
use taxpayer money to pay these transnational corporations for any
environmental or regulatory costs that these corporations expended to meet
local standards. Many existing laws would need to be rewritten and no new
regulatory laws could be passed.
Governments that tried to pass regulations such as limits on the
financial industry using risky bets such as derivatives would have the
burden of proof to defend such regulations in a court system controlled by
the corporations. The taxpayers would pay should a corporation prevail in
one of these "private courts". In fact over $350 million of taxpayer money
has already been paid out to corporations under the NAFTA style deals,
because of zoning laws, toxic bans, timber rules and other regulations.
This TPP agreement is like NAFTA on steroids. This corporate tribunal
bears a resemblance to the private US Supreme Court approved binding
arbitration that corporations use to severely limit an individual's or a
group's right to sue for damages. With binding arbitration we essentially
have a "private corporate court system" outside of any government judicial
system where the corporations choose the arbitrators and pay for their
services. This creates an apparent conflict of interest because the
arbitrators know that if they do not rule favorably to the corporations in
the majority of cases, they will not be hired back.
The kangaroo courts setup by this TPP agreement will have binding
corporate guarantees with both trade and cash sanctions. These cash
sanctions would effectively transfer taxpayer money to transnational
corporate coffers. Can you imagine the excesses we will see in the
financial industry as they challenge regulations within their own private
court system forcing governments to pay or eliminate them? The result of
these corporate tribunals will be to setup a race to the bottom, where if
one country chooses not to regulate something, then the corporations would
be able to sue the other nations inside of the TPP to have taxpayers cover
their losses for any such regulations. These other countries would be
vulnerable to corporate led lawsuits to be decided in the corporate
tribunals.
So how could such an extreme agreement that literally gives corporations
everything they could possibly want have been negotiated with little or no
resistance? The answer is that the ONLY way this agreement could ever pass
is if everything is done in secret and the details never see the light of
day. Lori Wallach, the director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch
recently said:
"These agreements are a little bit like Dracula. You drag them in the
sunshine, and they do not fare well. But all of us, and also across all of
the countries involved, there are citizen movements that are basically
saying that this is not in our name. We don't need global enforceable
corporate rights. We need more democracy. We need more accountability."
These talks have been so secret that Senator Ron Wyden, chairman of the
Trade Committee in the Senate which has jurisdiction over trade
agreements has been denied any access to information on the negotiations
for over 2-1/2 years. This is a man who is on the Intelligence Committee
and has access to nuclear secrets, yet he cannot see this TPP agreement?
On the Democratic side, Senator Wyden has introduced legislation to force
the Obama administration to make the details of these secret negotiations
available to the Senate Committee.
On the Republican side, Representative Darryl Issa has also questioned
the Obama administration's extreme levels of secrecy on this agreement.
This is not a liberal cause, this is not a conservative cause, this is a
common cause. It is vital that the public be aware of this TPP agreement
because BOTH of the 2012 presidential candidates are supporting this
agreement. Since TPP was negotiated under the watch of the Obama
administration, and Mitt Romney has indicated that he wants to quickly
complete negotiations of this bill, the results of the next election will
be irrelevant to the future status of this bill.
With the corporate takeover of sovereign governments, we see the very
essence of a global fascist system. When most people think of fascism,
they think of Hitler brown shirts marching through the streets, however,
that is not the real definition of fascism. Fascism was defined by
President Franklin Roosevelt:
"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth
of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic
state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism – ownership of government
by an individual, by a group"
Polls show that most Americans from both major political party believe
that money exerts far too much influence on public officials, effectively
making these elected officials the "hired servants" of the wealthy elites.
Both the Tea Party and the Occupy Movement believe that there is too much
influence of money on our legislators. Our representatives are essentially
the puppets while the corporate elites are the puppeteers. What this TPP
agreement does is to take this puppet metaphor to the international level.
Our elections have been reduced to the people choosing who will be the
"hired servants" of the power elites from a list preapproved by these same
elites.
This TPP agreement is nothing less than a power grab by the largest
corporations on the planet to establish a legal framework for global
corporate government making all sovereign governments subject to
international law enforced by corporations. Passage of this bill would
essentially be corporate coup against all member states.
So while this TPP agreement should frighten anyone who is still
breathing, the threat does not end as the corporations make their ultimate
grab for power. Here are some of the other forces that are potentially
focusing the power of the corporate state:
National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA)
With the passage of the NDAA, our legislators overrode constitutional
protections so that Americans who are "suspected" of providing "material
support" to a terrorist organization can be detained indefinitely on
American soil, without access to legal counsel, and without any charges
being filed. Think about this for a minute, you do not even have to be
charged with a crime and you can be locked up indefinitely? What exactly
does "material support" mean? Exactly what is a terrorist? Some states
have actually declared that people who secretly video record animal
mistreatment as "terrorists", even if no property damage was done. If
nonviolent protests can be declared as terrorist acts, it does not take a
great leap of the imagination to see how NDAA might be applied. Imagine if
the government used NDAA legislation against journalists or whistleblowers
such as Julius Assange, Russ Tice, or even Daniel Elsberg? How will we
ever know what is happening in a corporate state if the corporations are
successful in indefinitely detaining those who would shed light on their
activities?
This NDAA is another example of dangerous legislation being passed in
darkness. This bill was signed by Obama on December 31, 2011, during the
Christmas break when the media attention would be minimal. In an effort to
divide the opposition to the indefinite detention of Americans, Obama
promised that his administration would never use the provisions. The
questions most people should be asking is: "what is to prevent any future
president or even Obama himself from using indefinite detention, and if
there is no need for concern over this, why was it necessary to make that
signing statement?" Progressive and conservative groups such the ACLU, Gun
Owners Foundation, Tea Party Movement, Institute of the Constitution, US
Justice Foundation, Tenth Amendment Center, Occupy Wall St, and many
other groups are joining forces to fight this legislation. On social
media, resistance in the form of a Facebook group called "Recall Every
Congressman Who Voted for NDAA" has been formed. Now, in the context of
the TPP, think of how useful this NDAA law could be to a global corporate
government in silencing its critics.
Citizens United Ruling
Americans have long had a sneaking suspicion that there was a "hidden
hand" directing our government in Washington and the states, and they were
right. The "hidden hand" was actually the corporations, unions, and other
self-serving special interests that contribute literally $billions to our
politicians in order to influence legislation that will favor them. This
has happened even with limits that had been placed on these groups that
prevented them from directly contributing to campaigns. Thursday January
21 2010, will go down in history as a dark day. This is the day that a
divided Supreme Court, in the Citizens United v. FEC ruling, removed all
limits on corporate political campaign spending. If you thought our
politicians were corrupt and beholden to corporations before, things are
about to get a LOT WORSE now that all limits have been removed. Justices
Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy swept aside decades of
legislative restrictions on the money from corporations in political
campaigns and ruled that companies can use corporate funds to support or
oppose candidates. This ruling will certainly take its place in history
alongside other shameful rulings such as Dred Scott v. Sandford, and
Plessy v. Ferguson. These 5 justices opened the floodgates of unlimited
funds to influence elections. The strangle hold the banks have over the
nation's wealth will now be amplified by this Supreme Court ruling now
that all limits on campaign financing by corporations have been removed.
This black day will go rightly go down in history where the Supreme Court
officially validated the takeover of the government by the corporations.
The 2012 primary election cycle has already seen where approximately 4
dozen people have contributed massively to the super PACS and decided the
outcome of the elections. This type of money influence will cut both ways
regardless of which political party you support. One donor has stated that
he is willing to spend $100 million in this election cycle. This one
single donor "donated" the same amount as 2 million families sending a
check for $50. This type of funding by large donors undermines the very
foundation of our government and creates an environment conducive to
corruption. Now in the context of the TPP, think of the impact that huge
global corporations will have on governments with their ability to spend
unlimited money anonymously.
Corporate domination of media
Media ownership has now become so concentrated that six corporations
effectively control US media today. These companies are Time Warner, Walt
Disney, Viacom, Murdoch's News Corp, CBS Corporation, and NBC Universal.
With this type of concentration, it becomes very difficult to find
diversified news in order to form independent opinions. One aspect of this
concentration is the increasing number of negative political ads, many of
which have no accountability as to their factual accuracy. This will end
badly if we do not stop the media from undermining the foundations of our
election system. This concentration of media ownership allows billionaires
and corporations to ensure that the politicians who will work to pass self
serving legislation favoring these wealthy elites are elected to office.
One place where the corporate media has not met with great success in
controlling is the independent media on the Internet. Attempts have been
made to control access to it, to create "toll system" , as well as
extreme copyright rules. We have seen a veritable alphabet soup of acts
designed to enhance corporate profits and limit the flow of information.
Some examples include PIPA, SOPA, CISPA, and it seems as soon as they are
knocked down due to public resistance, another threat arises. For now, the
Internet has remained free and a diverse source of information, but
vigilance must be maintained. Now, think of the effect that the loss of
an open Internet and the increasingly concentrated media ownership will
have on the electorate when combined with the unlimited funding that the
Citizens United ruling allows, as well as the power that the transnational
corporations could gain under TPP.
Increasing Use of Drones for Domestic Surveillance
The use of drones for domestic surveillance is becoming more and more
common. The FAA has approved drones for use over the United States and
projects that 30,000 drones will be over our skies by 2020. The EPA is
actually using drones to monitor cattle ranchers in Iowa, police and
universities are using them, and cities are using drones to keep an "eye
on things". New much smaller drones the size of birds and insects are now
in development. These smaller drones will be cheaper to produce and
deploy which will likely raise the 30,000 estimate significantly and will
be much harder to detect. Under a government subservient to the
corporations, these drones would effectively be controlled and "regulated"
by the corporations. Can you imagine the misuse of this technology to
violate any privacy we may have left and to conduct clandestine
surveillance?
Militarization of Police Forces
The militarization of our police forces is proceeding rapidly. After 9-11,
the Department of Homeland Security gave generous grants to police forces
across the nation. Some of the purchases included riot gear, armored
personnel carriers, and even acoustic weapons for small towns. A nexus has
formed between vendors of military equipment and the nation's police
forces. There are certainly consequences to this militarization of police
forces. Once a police officer is deployed into a situation with full riot
gear and military training, the chances of violence increases
significantly even when the protests remain peaceful. There is significant
evidence of this during the Occupy demonstrations.
The roles of police and military are totally different. The police are
trained to protect lives, the military is trained to take lives. Consider
how these same military trained riot police would be used when they are
under the effective control of the transnational corporations and how they
would be utilized to silence their critics.
Privatization of Prisons
The privatization of prisons is expanding rapidly. In most societies
prisons are run by the state where the incentive is to have fewer
prisoners with a lower recidivism rate. In a private system the perverse
incentive is to maximize the number of prisoners, and raise the recidivism
rate in order to maximize profits. This results in higher numbers of
prisoners, broken families, poor healthcare for inmates, and few resources
spent to prepare inmates to reenter society. This has contributed to the
shame of the US having largest prison population on the planet whether
measured in absolute numbers or on a per capita basis, with most prisoners
serving time for non-violent crimes. The private for profit prison
industry is growing and has actually influenced immigration legislation in
Arizona in order to gain more inmates and raise profits. Think of the
impact that private prisons, private policing, private contractors
providing soldiers for hire, all with loyalty to $$$ instead of their
country. We will quickly devolve into a fascist controlled state. This
aspect of corporate control should be one of the most frightening to
everyone who holds freedom and democracy dear.
Lack of Prosecution For Financial Fraud
If a criminal gets away with committing a crime, there is a strong
likelihood that they will commit it again. The lack of prosecution for the
major financial fraud that brought about the 2008 economic collapse almost
guarantees that it will happen again. Justice Department officials have
stated that these are difficult and complex cases. However, during the
Savings & Loan crisis, there were thousands of successful felony
convictions, despite the fact that it was 1/70 the size of the 2008
crisis. In fact when the 50 Attorneys General were close to starting their
own prosecutions due to the lack of any federal action, the Obama
administration stepped in and negotiated its own agreement.
To paraphrase David Petrovich, the Executive Director for Society For
Preservation of Continued Homeownership:
"This agreement granted immunity to the big banks for the criminal
robosigning where they forged documents and fraudulently tried to present
them in courts across the country. This was essentially another bailout of
the banks only this time the bailout was not in the form of money, but
rather where changes were made in the law to retroactively transform
banks' illegal behavior into legal behavior. (Watch how this concept of
"retroactive" immunity comes up again.) Think about what would happen if
you or I forged notarized signatures and tried to pass them off in court.
We certainly would serve prison time. Yet, these huge banks were let off
the hook even after forging tens of thousands of these signatures and
illegally foreclosing on peoples' homes."<
We also recently had the spectacle of the Senate Banking Committee
"questioning" one of its largest donors. While wearing presidential seal
cuff links, presumably to show his powerful connections, JP Morgan chair
Jamie Dimon, easily handled all the softball questions asked of him.
Dimon lost over $3 billion (and growing) on risky derivative bets and yet
these same senators actually had the audacity to ask him for input and
advice on regulating his bank. Think about the implications of total
immunity from prosecution for financial crimes in an environment where the
TPP has been approved and global corporations are the effective government.
Lack of Protection for Whistleblowers
The increasing prosecution and harassment of whistleblowers has a chilling
effect on government transparency . The government often prosecutes the
whistleblower rather than the crime that the whistleblower reveals. The
Obama campaign in 2008 promised to protect whistle blowers, but instead he
has been waging a relentless war against them. Bradley Manning was
declared guilty by Obama BEFORE he was even charged with any crime, yet
the shooting of the journalists by the US helicopter crew and their
callous statements during the shooting was ignored. When William Binney
blew the whistle on the NSA's huge surveillance program, the FBI raided
his home in an effort to quiet and intimidate him. Corporations as well as
government also often retaliate against whistle blowers. In a corporate
state, how would the citizens know about the activities of the
corporations if there is no protection for whistleblowers?
Corporate Spying On Americans
The information William Binney made public dramatized the huge scale of
the (at that time ) illegal surveillance that was being done on Americans.
It also included the fact that AT&T as well as other communication
companies were deeply involved in this illegal spying on US citizens.
Later, as lawsuits against the corporations started to look like they
would be successful, the Obama administration claimed state secrets to
kill the lawsuits. Since the telecommunications industry is another VERY
large "contributor" to political loyalists, Congress showed its gratitude
by passing legislation to grant the telecommunication companies
retroactive immunity. (This concept retroactive immunity comes up again.)
The questions that should come to mind are: "if no crime was committed,
why were the corporations granted retroactive immunity, or if crimes were
committed, why were these corporations granted retroactive immunity?"
Think of the implications of this in a corporate state, with the
increasing use of smaller and smaller drones in an environment that allows
corporations to legally spy on you. Then also consider this concept of
governments granting retroactive immunity for criminal actions in order to
please their major corporate donors. How will the transnational
corporations use these "tools" to maximize their profits or to silence
opposition?
Summary
What we see is a confluence of forces that has the potential to solidify a
shift towards corporate fascism and encase it in international law.
Governments will merely be the tools of the corporations to provide a
degree of separation from the inevitable police state that will accompany
this corporate global governance. Sovereign governments even with all
their failings still have at least some concern for the general welfare of
their citizens. Corporations by their very nature have only one purpose
and that is to generate profits. If an individual whose sole purpose was
to blindly enhance profits, without any regard to the standards of what is
wrong and what is right in society, would likely be considered a sociopath
by mental health experts.
If the TPP were to be enshrined into international law, these same
sociopath corporations would now lord over sovereign governments,
indifferent to criminal law, and beyond the control of nation-states. They
would have the ability to utilize the militaries of some states to wage
war on other "less complaint" states.
Doug Casey of Casey Research recently wrote:
"It's most unfortunate, but the US and its allies will turn into
authoritarian police states. Even more than they are today. Much more,
actually. They'll all be perfectly fascist – private ownership of both
consumer goods and the means of production topped by state control of
both. Fascism operates free of underlying principles or philosophy; it's
totally the whim of the people in control, and they'll prove ever more
ruthless. "
There are those who would say that it is unpatriotic to be against
corporations, however should corporations be in the business of
governing? An open public debate on the future role of corporations is
needed.
It is vital that the details of this TPP agreement become widely known
and circulated. Once it sees the light of day, it will be defeated because
people will oppose it. Sorry, corporations really are NOT people, they are
merely state created entities.
What Can You Do?
Get money out of politics
Until we get money out of politics, corporate control of our government
will continue and because of the Citizens United ruling, will most likely
increase. Attempts at a corporate coups such as this TPP agreement will
continue and will keep resurfacing in various re-invented forms until one
day one will be successful. We have already seen this pattern with the
repeated attempts to impose limits the Internet.
There are organizations that are working towards eliminating the
corrupting influence of money. Find out more about them and support their
efforts. Some of them include:
Public Citizen
http://www.citizen.org/
Common Cause
http://www.commoncause.org/
United Republic
http://unitedrepublic.org/
End the secret TPP negotiations
Until we bring this process into public view, there is the danger that it
will be passed quickly and secretly with little or no congressional or
public input. Once the details of these agreements are made public, the
TPP will defeated, or at the very least modified.
There are organizations that are fighting this TPP agreement and they
deserve your efforts and support. Some of them include:
http://www.citizen.org/tpp
http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/
http://www.straight.com/article-688656/vancouver/prointernet-community-must-
fight-tpp-weekly-update-openmediaca
We have reached a crossroad where either we allow the corporations to
take control of our nations, or we stop them in their attempts. Take an
evening off from the TV and make the effort to make a difference so that
you leave your children a better future. Don't expect others to do this
vital task.
Rudy Avizius
http://www.endtheillusion.org/
Another article on the Trans Pacific Partnership agreement.
Share this:
Share
Like this:
Like
4 bloggers like this.
Categories:
Economic, Social
Tags:
government, corporate, New World Order, Trans Pacific Partnership, TPP,
fascism, governance, trade agreement, NAFTA
Comments (4)
Trackbacks (0)
Leave a comment
Trackback
ken lusk
June 23, 2012 at 11:07 AM | #1
Reply | Quote
The corporations will bribe the politicians obviously and all the others
necessary to implement their CommuFascist Corporatist Welfare Kings agenda
to colonize the world and the USA taxpayers are funding it with the FORCED
CONTRIBUTIONS, withholding taxes,by taxing labor to fund the New World
Order[NWO], which incidentally is Biblical Prophecy and, referred to as
the Beast on Revelations. The Mark of the Beast is 666 which refers to the
bank accounts necessary to "buy and sell", commercial transactions.The
prominent examples now are Iran,Syria which the Beast, NWO, has imposed
sanctions on depriving them of their abilities to buy and sell, depriving
them commercial transactions.
b.bailey
June 25, 2012 at 12:56 AM | #2
Reply | Quote
this is one of the best articles i have ever read on the history of
corporate global takeover and how it happened. everyone should read this,
wake up, and get busy!
Russ Hallberg
June 25, 2012 at 4:55 AM | #3
Reply | Quote
This is to set up a fascist coalition against China!
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1111/S00589/tpp-and-us-anti-china-strategy-
conclusions.htm
It appears none of the Shanghai Cooperative Association countries are in
the TPP. We have the perfect setting for World War Three or a new Cold
War, with hotspots.
End The Illusion
June 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM | #4
Reply | Quote
Interesting point Russ. It looks like this TPP is like a bad drug with
many side effects that will hurt those who actually work for a living.
--
http://endtheillusion.wordpress.com/2012/06/21/new-world-order-blueprint-lea
ked/